Skip to content

Eva Siegmann

Visiting Fellow, Council on Strategic Risks, Janne E. Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons

Eva Siegmann is a Visiting Fellow at the Council on Strategic Risks’ Janne E. Nolan Center on Strategic Weapons, where she focuses on biosecurity and biodefense. Prior to joining CSR, Eva was a consultant with the Nuclear Threat Initiative’s biosecurity team (NTI | bio), contributing to efforts to strengthen global norms against biological weapons. She also supported the implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention as a Political Affairs Intern with the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs in Geneva.

Eva began her work on biosecurity as a research assistant for the CBWNet project at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg. Her broader expertise in WMD policy includes research on nuclear deterrence and disarmament at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique in Paris and work with ICAN Germany.

She holds an MA in Security Studies from Georgetown University, a Dual BA in Social and Political Science from Sciences Po Paris and the Free University of Berlin and is fluent in English, German and French.

Content by Eva Siegmann

Commentary

Deterrence without destruction: Rethinking responses to biological threats

Scientific advances have renewed a discussion around the possibility of potentially devastating biological attacks. Eva Siegmann writes that nuclear deterrence is inadequate to deter biological threats. Instead, the threat of biological weapons should be addressed via international efforts rooted in transparency and cooperation. Leveraging the mechanisms of the Biological Weapons Convention and implementing deterrence-by-denial strategies can effectively mitigate risks.

28 November 2024 | Eva Siegmann
Commentary

Ok, Doomer! The NEVER Podcast – The End of the World for Beginners

Listen to the first episode of the NEVER podcast – Ok, Doomer! In this episode, we explore the basics of man-made existential risk, featuring an introduction to the topic, its relationship to great power competition, how governments have dealt with potential existential risks such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, and how they should respond to them in future.