Skip to content

Eva Siegmann

Master's Student

Eva Siegmann is a graduate student in Security Studies at Georgetown University, concentrating on technology and security. Her research interests revolve around mitigating existential and global catastrophic risks associated with advanced technologies, including nuclear weapons, synthetic biology, and artificial intelligence.

She previously worked as a Political Affairs Intern at the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs in Geneva, where she supported the Biological Weapons Convention’ Implementation Support Unit. Her interest in biosecurity started as a research assistant in the CBWNet project at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.

Before focusing on biosecurity, Eva researched nuclear policy at the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique in Paris and contributed to ICAN Germany. Since 2023, Eva has been a member of the European Leadership Network’s inaugural “New European Voices on Existential Risk”. She holds a Double Bachelor’s degree in social and political science from Sciences Po Paris and the Free University of Berlin, and speaks fluent German and French.

Content by Eva Siegmann

Commentary

Deterrence without destruction: Rethinking responses to biological threats

Scientific advances have renewed a discussion around the possibility of potentially devastating biological attacks. Eva Siegmann writes that nuclear deterrence is inadequate to deter biological threats. Instead, the threat of biological weapons should be addressed via international efforts rooted in transparency and cooperation. Leveraging the mechanisms of the Biological Weapons Convention and implementing deterrence-by-denial strategies can effectively mitigate risks.

28 November 2024 | Eva Siegmann
Commentary

Ok, Doomer! The NEVER Podcast – The End of the World for Beginners

Listen to the first episode of the NEVER podcast – Ok, Doomer! In this episode, we explore the basics of man-made existential risk, featuring an introduction to the topic, its relationship to great power competition, how governments have dealt with potential existential risks such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, and how they should respond to them in future.