Skip to content

Nuclear and New Technologies

Rapid technological advances present potential new opportunities for decision-makers. However, the race for technological superiority creates new risks, which are not yet fully understood. Since 2020, the ELN has been engaged in a project of work which seeks to identify the impacts of emerging and disruptive technologies on nuclear decision-making and present practical steps to mitigate the potential disruptive effects 

View the Guardrails and Self-Assessment (GSA) Framework

What?

The project will help set the agenda for a recognised and fast-changing but neglected area of nuclear risk: mitigating the impacts of emerging and disruptive technologies (EDTs) on nuclear decision-making. Throughout this project, the ELN will provide innovative and important new tools for concrete nuclear risk reduction within the NPT framework. 

The fundamental aim of this project is risk reduction, assisting States in identifying and mitigating nuclear use pathways and potential mistakes/miscalculations. 

The ELN has previously identified the following emerging and disruptive technologies which could have unintended consequences on nuclear weapons use: 1) autonomous weapons and drones 2) counterspace capabilities 3) cyber offensive capabilities 4) artificial intelligence 5) deepfakes, and 6) quantum technologies. 

Why?

Emerging and disruptive technologies offer potential advantages. However, the rush by many nations to achieve “technological superiority” means that risks do not always receive the attention required. 

Emerging and disruptive technologies have the potential to amplify decision-making complexities, exacerbating current ambiguities and escalating the likelihood of misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and miscalculations. These factors could culminate in a chain reaction of unintended consequences, potentially resulting in the use of nuclear weapons. 

Recognising that substantial efforts have already been invested in understanding the implications of each individual technology on nuclear command, control and communications systems, the ELN’s unique contribution is to take a holistic approach and examine the technological complexity presented by disruptive technologies operating in aggregate. 

How?

The project will consist of three strands of work to better understand EDTs and technological complexity and produce detailed recommendations risk reduction parties to reduce nuclear risks: 

  1. Strand 1 focuses on developing a framework to address likely challenges of EDTs to nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3) and nuclear weapons decision-making, composed of a set of guardrails and self-assessment measures that States can unilaterally adopt to mitigate nuclear risks in light of advancements in EDTs and their integration into the military domain.
  2. Through Strand 2, the ELN seeks to create a developmental prototype digital tool that will simulate the highest-level nuclear weapons decision-making instances, the impact of EDTs in these processes, and the way the framework developed in Strand 1 can mitigate the risks generated by the aggregate effects of EDTs.
  3. Strand 3 will develop a sustained EDTs and technological complexity risk reduction campaign, supported by ELN’s networks and sister networks in Asia and Latin America, to implement the recommendations among nuclear weapons and non-nuclear weapons States, and throughout multilateral and supra-national instances, such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review cycle, the Creating and Environment for ND, the Stockholm Initiative, the NATO Nuclear Planning Group, among others.

 

Find out more about our previous iteration of this project

Project publications

Report

Towards a better understanding of human bias in nuclear decision-making and its interaction with emerging and disruptive technologies

This report by Ganna Pogrebna and ELN Senior Policy Fellow Rishi Paul presents findings from an ELN workshop that examined the ‘human’ and ‘machine’ components of bias and their points of interaction. The report highlights how human judgment and AI systems can interact in ways that reinforce, rather than reduce, risk.

27 February 2026 | Ganna Pogrebna and Rishi Paul
Video

From Risk to Reduction: Practical steps for safer nuclear systems

Nuclear weapons aren’t going anywhere, and the way we manage them can and must keep evolving. Today’s security environment is more complex than during the Cold War: more nuclear-armed states, faster decision-making technologies, and fewer treaties providing guardrails. The good news? Proven tools exist to reduce risk, from fail-safe mechanisms to dialogue between adversaries, and they don’t all require perfect trust or total agreement. This animation explains both the challenges and the credible paths forward.

17 February 2026
Commentary

From nuclear stability to AI safety: Why nuclear policy experts must help shape AI’s future

Artificial intelligence, much like nuclear technologies, has the capacity to transform our world for the better, offering breakthroughs in several fields whilst simultaneously posing catastrophic risks. Nuclear policy experts, skilled in managing existential threats, are well-suited to guide AI governance. ELN Network and Communications Manager Andrew Jones argues that urgent, coordinated international action and further collaboration between experts in the nuclear and AI fields is needed before AI outpaces our ability to control it.

25 April 2025 | Andrew Jones
Policy brief

Technological complexity and risk reduction: Using digital twins to navigate uncertainty in nuclear weapons decision-making and EDT landscapes

This policy brief explores the integration of digital twin technologies into nuclear decision-making processes, assessing their potential to reduce risks stemming from emerging disruptive technologies (EDTs). It argues for international dialogue, transparency, and responsible innovation to prevent misuse, enhance NC3 resilience, and strengthen strategic stability through informed, scenario-based crisis simulations.

Who's involved?

Funders